<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CIA Air Strike in Pakistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stengazette.org/wordpress/2006/02/05/cia-air-strike-in-pakistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stengazette.org/wordpress/2006/02/05/cia-air-strike-in-pakistan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:49:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phiafly</title>
		<link>http://stengazette.org/wordpress/2006/02/05/cia-air-strike-in-pakistan/#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>Phiafly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stengazette.org/wordpress/?p=105#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>The CIA have been doing this sort of thing for many decades. They are America&#039;s assassins. Israel uses Mossad in the same manner. I don&#039;t see a problem with this sort of tactic in a time of war. When these powers are used in peace time, it&#039;s illegality is without question and an obvious breach of sovereignty. In answser to the question you posed about this being a covert operation, I think one can gleam from the last point in the CIA charter you listed, that this was &quot;covert&quot; in the sense that it was an invisable and secret attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CIA have been doing this sort of thing for many decades. They are America&#8217;s assassins. Israel uses Mossad in the same manner. I don&#8217;t see a problem with this sort of tactic in a time of war. When these powers are used in peace time, it&#8217;s illegality is without question and an obvious breach of sovereignty. In answser to the question you posed about this being a covert operation, I think one can gleam from the last point in the CIA charter you listed, that this was &#8220;covert&#8221; in the sense that it was an invisable and secret attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

